The soda aisle presents a dizzying array of choices: regular soda, diet soda, zero-sugar soda, and a rising tide of alternative sodas. With concerns mounting about the health implications of sugary drinks, many consumers are turning to diet and zero-sugar options. But are these alternatives truly better for you? This article delves into the world of zero-sugar and diet sodas, exploring their origins, ingredients, potential health effects, and how they stack up against each other.
The Problem with Regular Soda
Drinking sugar-laden regular soda is associated with an increased risk for metabolic syndrome, heart disease, and a list of other health problems. A 12-ounce can of cola packs 39 grams-nearly 10 teaspoons-of sugar, exceeding the American Heart Association’s recommended daily limit of 25 grams of added sugars for women and 36 grams for men.
Regular consumption of such sugary drinks can have serious long-term effects. Repeated blood sugar surges can cause cells to become less responsive to insulin, a condition called insulin resistance. Both insulin resistance and a high-sugar diet can lead to high blood pressure, Type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Much of regular soda’s sweetness comes from highly processed high fructose corn syrup, which further contributes to the development of insulin resistance and NAFLD.
Diet vs. Zero Sugar: What's the Difference?
According to the FDA, diet, sugar-free, and zero sugar products must have less than 0.5 grams of sugar per serving. Beyond that, there’s no specific regulation for diet and zero sugar labels; often, the difference is branding. The major soft drink manufacturers say it comes down to taste. According to Coca-Cola, Diet Coke has a blend of flavors for a lighter taste, while Coca-Cola Zero Sugar tastes more like the original. Another distinction is the sweeteners. Typically diet drinks, such as Diet Coke, exclusively use the artificial sweetener aspartame. While most zero sugar drinks are mainly sweetened with aspartame, they also contain acesulfame potassium (another artificial sweetener) and sometimes a small amount of stevia (a natural sweetener).
Origins of Diet and Zero-Sugar Sodas
The journey of Coca-Cola's sugar-free offerings started with Diet Coke in 1983. This low-calorie cola was a big step into the calorie-free sodas market. In 2006, Coca-Cola introduced Coke Zero for young adult males. In 2016, Coca-Cola changed Coke Zero to Coca-Cola Zero Sugar. They made it taste more like the classic Coca-Cola.
Read also: Learn how spa therapy can enhance your overall health.
The first diet soda hit markets in 1952, and the industry has taken wild turns since. No-Cal, invented by Hyman Kirsch (a noted pioneer in the world of sugar-free soft drinks), replaced sugar with cyclamate, an artificial sweetener. The soda was initially intended for consumers with diabetes and cardiovascular issues. However, once No-Cal was on the shelves, it became clear that dieters were its primary demographic.
Diet-Rite Cola, which was released by the Royal Cola Company in 1958, was created to help people with diabetes and others who needed to limit their sugar intake. Instead of sugar, this soda was made with cyclamate and saccharin for added sweetness. By 1960, it was the fourth most popular soft drink, behind Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and 7-Up.
At this point, major soda brands felt that they needed to catch up and corner their own share of the market. This led to the creation of drinks like TaB by the Coca-Cola Company, which was the top diet soda in the 1960s and 1970s. In 1963, Pepsi released Patio (renamed Diet Pepsi a year later) to immediate popularity and celebrity endorsements (fans of Mad Men might even remember it). However, Diet Coke wasn’t released until 1982, largely due to concerns about associating the word diet with the iconic Coke trademark. (The drink became a smashing success.)
Zero-sugar sodas really only began making waves in the 2000s. Compared to diet sodas, these soft drinks were heavily marketed to Millennials (and later, Gen Z) but weren’t advertised in quite the same way as sugar-free sodas were to Boomers or Gen X in previous decades. These drinks were positioned as ideal for consumers invested in their health who were seeking low-calorie, no-sugar alternatives to their favorite soft drinks.
For consumers, the most obvious difference for Coke Zero might be right on the label-an aversion to the word diet. Taste of Home reports Greg Lyons, chief marketing officer of PepsiCo North America, has said, “No Gen Z wants to be on a diet these days. Younger people just don’t like the word diet.” The word-which, for some, is off-putting-doesn’t seem to resonate with younger audiences, especially those who embrace more of a body-positive message.
Read also: Facial oil: Benefits and how to use
Sweeteners: A Key Difference
Unlike the sugar in regular sodas, aspartame and acesulfame potassium in zero sugar sodas don’t raise blood glucose in the majority of people. They’re also calorie-free and generally recognized as safe by the FDA.
The sweetener used in most diet sodas today, including Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi, is aspartame, which was classified as “possibly carcinogenic” by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in 2023. But that category is broad, including substances as varied as gasoline exhaust and aloe vera. In fact, experts say it’s unlikely that the amount of aspartame in diet sodas would cause any health problems, so long as drinks are consumed in moderation. Having a Diet Coke every day with lunch shouldn’t make you overly concerned about your aspartame intake (though daily consumption might lead to other health issues).
The soda industry has faced significant hurdles over the years, though, thanks to the artificial sweeteners used in diet formulas. The Delaney Clause of the 1958 Food Additives Amendment requires the FDA to ban all food additives that found to be carcinogenic. As scientific knowledge has evolved over time, some artificial sweeteners have been deemed carcinogenic, like cyclamate. This meant that various reformulations of classic diet sodas were necessary, especially as some consumers rejected the different flavor profiles of various alternative sweeteners.
Taste and Marketing
If you've ever taken a sip of a zero sugar soda and expected diet soda flavor, or vice versa, you already know: Not all sugar-free sodas taste the same. Take Coke, for example. Diet Coke leans solely on aspartame, which gives it a sharper, more acidic flavor, while Coke Zero Sugar blends aspartame with acesulfame potassium (Ace-K) to create a rounder, sweeter sip that aims to mimic classic Coca-Cola. Pepsi follows a similar playbook - Diet Pepsi is aspartame-forward, while Pepsi Zero Sugar adds Ace-K to round out the sweetness. Dr Pepper takes another route: Diet Dr Pepper relies on aspartame, while Dr Pepper Zero Sugar uses aspartame plus Ace-K for more of that signature 23-flavor depth.
Brands have moved away from the word "diet" in favor of "zero sugar," hoping to dodge outdated connotations of dieting. Zero sugar sodas have evolved since their launch, yet the purpose has stayed consistent: It's meant to taste like regular soda, just without the sugar. That's why many sodas use sweetener combos, which helps it land closer to the original's taste. For example, if you grew up on Diet Coke, Coke Zero might taste too sweet. If you're a Zero loyalist, Diet might hit too sharp or too metallic. And it's not just about what's in the can; it's about how it feels when you crack it open and it hits your lips.
Read also: The role of alpha-keto acids in metabolism.
Coke Zero vs. Diet Coke: A Detailed Comparison
Coke Zero and Diet Coke are top picks for those who want sugar-free, calorie-free sodas. They share some traits but differ in taste, ingredients, and who they're for. Coke Zero tries to taste like regular Coca-Cola, aiming for a similar flavor. Diet Coke, on the other hand, has a lighter taste thanks to unique flavor mixes.
The main difference between Coke Zero and Diet Coke is their taste and sweeteners. Coke Zero tastes more like regular Coca-Cola. Diet Coke has a lighter, crisper taste. Coke Zero has no added sugars because it uses artificial sweeteners. Diet Coke also has no added sugars and uses artificial sweeteners.
Looking at Coke Zero and Diet Coke, we find some key differences in their ingredients. Both have carbonated water, caramel color, phosphoric acid, and caffeine. Aspartame is the main sweetener in both Coke Zero and Diet Coke. Coke Zero also uses acesulfame potassium, not found in Diet Coke. Coke Zero has potassium citrate, not in Diet Coke. Diet Coke, on the other hand, has citric acid, missing in Coke Zero.
Nutritional facts show that Coke Zero and Diet Coke are very similar. They both have zero calories, sugar, fat, and carbs in a 12-ounce serving. The main difference is in their sweeteners. Coke Zero uses aspartame and acesulfame potassium. Diet Coke only has aspartame. Diet Coke has more caffeine than Coke Zero, with 46 mg versus 34 mg per can.
Coke Zero and Diet Coke have different tastes that people like or dislike. Coke Zero tastes more like regular Coca-Cola, with a fuller flavor. Diet Coke, on the other hand, has a lighter taste that's unique.
Potential Health Concerns
But that doesn’t mean they’re good for you. The science on artificial sweeteners’ effect on appetite is mixed. Some research suggests that the sweet taste may confuse the brain because it receives sweet signals but no calories, in turn causing you to seek out something to eat. But this impact may depend on what blend of sweeteners is consumed. One study found that drinking a beverage with acesulfame potassium before a meal didn’t cause people to eat more, suggesting that its sweetness didn’t rev up appetite. And according to a meta-analysis of 11 clinical trials, stevia also doesn’t affect hunger levels, although more research is needed.
Some experts think that regular consumption of zero sugar drinks and their artificial sweeteners may harm the gut in various ways. One theory is that, over the long term, aspartame suppresses the activity of an enzyme called intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP). When this happens, the gut becomes more permeable, leading to increased inflammation. It may also increase enzyme activity that leads to fat accumulation.
The science is murkier when it comes to the gut microbiome. Some human studies have shown that artificial sweeteners, including aspartame, reduce the diversity of bacteria in the gut. At the same time, other research suggests that artificial sweeteners don’t have much of an effect on the gut microbiome. Experts explain that these results are influenced by the number of people in the study and their lifestyles.
In a mouse study, long-term consumption of acesulfame potassium increased insulin and leptin levels and altered activity in the area of the brain called the hippocampus, leading to impaired learning ability. Experts suspect that these changes may be tied to how artificial sweeteners affect metabolism, but the science is conflicting. Some research suggests that high doses of aspartame cause oxidative stress, which may damage proteins involved in the insulin response. Scientists are also studying how changes in the gut microbiome may lead to metabolic syndrome. Additionally, both aspartame and acesulfame potassium have been shown to raise the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes, although a direct link isn’t proven. Scientists note that people at risk for Type 2 diabetes may be more likely to drink artificially sweetened drinks, which could influence the study results. And other short-term studies show that aspartame and acesulfame potassium have no impact on glucose metabolism and diabetes risk.
Consuming artificial sweeteners is linked with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, according to an observational study of more than 130,000 people. The researchers hypothesize that the sweeteners may inhibit bacteria in the gut microbiome that affect insulin sensitivity and produce enzymes that break down carbohydrates. One preliminary study offers another potential mechanism: In mice, acesulfame potassium appears to interfere with fat metabolism in the liver.
Long term exposure to artificial sweeteners, such as aspartame, could lead to permanent damage to your body. The digestion of aspartame results in the production of methanol, aspartic acid, and phenylalanine.
Drinking more than 21 calorie-free sodas a week might nearly double the risk of being overweight or obese over 8 years. Aspartame, found in both Coke Zero and Diet Coke, might cause headaches in some. The health effects of these sweeteners are still unclear, and more research is needed. People with phenylketonuria (PKU) should avoid Coke Zero and Diet Coke.
Healthier Alternatives
If you wish to improve your overall health, the best option is to put down the soda altogether. However, if you can’t resist the craving for something sweet and carbonated, there are healthier alternatives gaining popularity. These alternative sodas often use natural sweeteners like monk fruit or stevia instead of artificial ones. They also tend to have fewer calories and contain healthier ingredients, such as apple cider vinegar, while being free of artificial coloring and additives.
Looking to cut down on artificial sweeteners? There are many great options besides Coke Zero and Diet Coke. Flavored waters, kombucha, and probiotic sodas are all sugar-free and refreshing. They also come without the bad stuff found in diet sodas. Plus, kombucha and probiotic sodas might even help your gut health.
Flavored sparkling waters from brands like La Croix and Spindrift are a great choice. They're calorie-free and sugar-free, making them a better option than diet sodas. Kombucha, a fermented tea, is also popular for those who want to avoid artificial additives. Craving the fizz of Coke Zero and Diet Coke? Try stevia-sweetened sodas or sparkling water with real fruit or herbs. Stevia is a plant-based sweetener that's calorie-free and sugar-free. It's a safer choice than artificial sweeteners.