TOPS Weight Loss Program Review: Is This Comprehensive Plan the Key to Your Success?

Losing weight and maintaining a healthy lifestyle can be challenging. Many individuals seek structured programs and support systems to guide them on their weight loss journey. Among the various options available, Take Off Pounds Sensibly (TOPS) stands out as a non-profit, peer-led weight loss program with a long history. This article delves into a comprehensive review of the TOPS weight loss program, exploring its structure, effectiveness, and overall value.

What is TOPS?

TOPS, which stands for Take Off Pounds Sensibly, is a non-profit charitable corporation. It was originally formed in 1948 as a response to the need to assist overweight and obese people to lose weight by setting up a support group system. Over the years as more weight management problems were identified, TOPS expanded its scope to include all people with weight problems. With members in chapters located worldwide, the majority of them in the United States and Canada, TOPS has a twofold objective: to sponsor research and foster support groups in human body weight control.

Core Principles and Structure

TOPS does not endorse any particular weight-loss plan and welcomes people into the membership even if they are actively involved in another weight-loss group. Instead, it provides a supportive environment where members can share their experiences, learn about healthy habits, and work towards their individual weight loss goals. Club meetings emphasize nutrition, exercise, motivation, behavior modification and wellness education focused on supplementing a member's effort to manage his or her weight. A local chapter of the club is set up in a small region, usually covering one community. Larger communities may have more than one chapter, either because of size limitations or to address the various schedules of their members.

Key Components of the TOPS Program

Weekly Meetings: Members meet weekly both for weight recording ("weigh-in") and for the main session. The weigh-in is performed in a private room with two members present as recording officers.
Goal Setting: Members are required to consult with their health care professional for a written goal weight for themselves. This goal is turned in to the recorders.
Educational Sessions: The main session in a chapter meeting is usually one of two types: education or special recognition. In either case, the meeting begins with a report of total losses or gains, in pounds, for the week, as tabulated from the just-completed weight recording.
Recognition and Incentives: Individual members are recognized for such things as losing the most pounds in one week among all the members. Small prizes are awarded to these "losers" (the word used within the confines of TOPS instead of "winners"). These prizes are funded from the weekly dues (one to two dollars) collected from the members.
Online Support: Three online weekly meetings are available for members who have no local or convenient chapter meeting or who prefer an online experience, including international members living outside of the USA and Canada.

Cost and Accessibility

One of the most appealing aspects of TOPS is its affordability. For $24 a year plus local chapter dues, members can attend weekly support meetings. This makes it a more accessible option compared to many commercial weight loss programs. TOPS only costs $90 annually. The peer-led format, low cost, and ease of implementation and dissemination of the TOPS program allow overweight and obese individuals who may not have access to commercial or academic programs, such as low-income, minority, and rural populations, an opportunity to participate in a structured weight management program that has been effective in some individuals.

Effectiveness of the TOPS Program

Several studies have examined the effectiveness of the TOPS program in promoting weight loss and maintenance.

Research Findings

Long-Term Weight Loss Maintenance: In a retrospective cohort study of overweight and obese men and women who joined TOPS in 2005-2011 and consecutively renewed their annual membership at least once, it was found that TOPS can effectively promote maintenance of clinically significant weight loss for an extended period of time.
Significant Weight Loss: Significant weight loss is defined as weight loss of 5% or more of initial weight because weight-related comorbidities improve with this amount of weight loss.
Sustained Weight Loss: In this completers’ analysis of “consecutive renewers,” on average, participants who renewed their membership every year sustained clinically significant weight loss for up to 7 years. Fifty percent of consecutive renewers lost 5% or more of their initial weight in their first year in the program, and 62% of the consecutive renewers had a cumulative weight loss of at least 5% at 7 years.
Weight Change: The average weight change for women and men in the first year was −6.0% and −6.3%, respectively. For those participants who remained in the program for >1 year, their average weight loss in the first year ranged from −6.7% to −7.2% for women and from −6.9 to −7.5% for men. For each cohort, the weight change was at least maintained at subsequent membership renewals.
Adjusted Results: The adjusted results from the mixed effects regression model showed that men started out significantly heavier than women (a mean of 20.8 kg heavier, p<0.001). For each year of consecutive renewal, individuals lost an average of 1.4 kg (p<0.001). Compared with women, men lost an additional 0.4 kg/year (p<0.001). The adjusted results for percentage weight loss show an average weight loss of 5.9% for the first year. Compared with women, men lost an additional 0.5% of their starting weight in the first year (p=0.004).
Retention Rates: Thirty-eight percent of TOPS members renewed their membership in the first year. The 1-year retention rate was 36% and the 7-year retention rate was 6%.
TOPS Genome Registry: It also supports the efforts of the TOPS Genome Registry at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, NC, under the direction of Michael Olivier, Ph.D.

Limitations of the Research

It's important to acknowledge the limitations of the studies on TOPS.

Self-Selection Bias: The analysis only gives information about those who continued in the program, which may have been a self-selected, highly motivated subset of particularly successful individuals, although many participants who renewed their memberships also gained weight; we have no data about the weight change of those did not renew.
Lack of Control Group: There is no control group. However, completers’ analyses for control groups in other behavioral studies lost between 0.1 and 3.3 kg, which is less than the renewers in this analysis.
Limited Demographic Information: The only demographic information available about the participants is their age and gender. Therefore, we are unable to determine if this program is equally effective among all racial/ethnic groups or socioeconomic strata.
Extent of Involvement: There is no indication about the extent of the participants’ involvement in the TOPS program; however, it is unlikely that individuals would choose to renew membership in an organization in which they were not participating.

Comparison with Other Weight Loss Programs

When evaluating weight loss programs, it's helpful to compare them across several dimensions, including cost, structure, support, and results.

TOPS vs. Weight Watchers (WW)

Cost: TOPS is significantly cheaper than Weight Watchers. TOPS only costs $90 annually.
Structure: TOPS does not endorse a specific diet plan, while Weight Watchers uses a points-based system.
Support: Both programs offer support through meetings, but Weight Watchers also provides digital tools and coaching.
Results: One-year weight loss in this real world analysis of TOPS is lower than in the real-world analyses of the Jenny Craig program-6.0% versus 12.3% and 13.0%; however, TOPS costs much less than Jenny Craig, is more accessible to a larger population, and has longer-term weight change data. Furthermore, the 1-year retention rate in this TOPS study is much higher than the published 1-year retention rates of Jenny Craig real-world studies-36% versus 7% and 10%.

TOPS vs. Jenny Craig

Cost: TOPS is far more affordable than Jenny Craig, which involves purchasing pre-packaged meals.
Structure: Jenny Craig relies on pre-planned meals, while TOPS encourages members to develop their own healthy eating habits.
Support: Both offer support, but Jenny Craig includes one-on-one counseling.
Results: While Jenny Craig may show faster initial weight loss, TOPS offers longer-term data on weight maintenance.

Is TOPS the Right Program for You?

Deciding whether TOPS is the right weight loss program depends on individual needs and preferences.

Factors to Consider

Budget: If cost is a significant concern, TOPS is an affordable option.
Self-Direction: If you prefer to create your own diet plan and appreciate a less structured approach, TOPS may be a good fit.
Support System: If you value peer support and enjoy attending weekly meetings, TOPS can provide a sense of community.
Motivation: If you are self-motivated and can stay committed to your weight loss goals without intensive coaching, TOPS can be effective.

Potential Drawbacks

Lack of Structure: The absence of a specific diet plan may be challenging for those who need more guidance.
Variable Chapter Quality: The quality of support can vary depending on the local chapter.
Slower Initial Weight Loss: Compared to some commercial programs, initial weight loss may be slower.

Additional Considerations

Consulting Healthcare Professionals: TOPS encourages members to consult a healthcare provider to determine a goal weight.
Partnering with Experts: TOPS meets with healthcare professionals at a variety of national conferences throughout the year (such as The Obesity Society, American Dietetic Association Food & Nutrition Conference, and the American Association of Diabetes Educators).
TOPS News: Once you become a member, you'll receive TOPS News, a monthly magazine that offers contests, weight-loss incentive plans, self-help articles, and recipes.

Read also: Comprehensive TOPS Review

Read also: Weight Loss with TOPS Diet

tags: #tops #weight #loss #program #review