The supplement industry has discovered a new, lucrative target: women who are frustrated with a healthcare system that has often dismissed their concerns. Primal Queen is one such company, asserting that their pills, containing bovine uterus and other organ meats, can solve a range of issues from low energy to hormonal imbalances. The company builds its brand around the claim that modern women should eat like “carnivorous cavewomen” to optimize their health.
The Allure of Ancestral Nutrition and "Nature's Multivitamin"
Primal Queen leverages the idea of returning to our roots by providing the body with dense nutrition that only beef organ superfoods can provide. The company claims that vitamins and minerals in beef organs are absorbed more efficiently because they come straight from the source. This concept appeals to primitivism while selling factory-processed supplements that depend entirely on modern technology.
However, the assertion that our ancestors followed carnivorous diets oversimplifies archaeological evidence. For example, isotope analysis of pre-agricultural human remains from Morocco indicates early humans were highly reliant on plant foods.
Examining the Claims: A Critical Look at Promised Benefits
Primal Queen makes a series of claims regarding the benefits users can expect over time:
Week 1: "Likely lift energy, mood, and cognition due to Vitamin B12, Zinc, and Copper." While these nutrients are essential, most Americans are not deficient in Vitamin B12 and can easily obtain it through animal products or fortified foods for vegans. Approximately 15% of Americans don’t consume enough zinc, but a varied diet including meat or legumes typically provides adequate amounts. Copper deficiency is rare in the USA, and over-supplementing zinc can actually interfere with copper absorption.
Read also: Benefits of couples massage detailed
Month 1: "Likely reduce iron deficiency leading to increased vitality, sex drive, and overall well-being." The terms "vitality" and "overall well-being" are classic wellness buzzwords, sounding meaningful but being impossible to measure scientifically. While abnormal uterine bleeding can cause iron deficiency and sexual dysfunction in women, any suspected iron deficiency should be diagnosed and treated by a healthcare professional. The analysis from a third-party tester shows 0.0013% iron in the sample, which is a very small amount. This is also the result from testing one batch of the supplement and there is no iron amount included on the packing of the supplement. This makes it impossible to evaluate the actual amount of iron included in a serving of Primal Queen supplements.
Month 2: "Abundance of B vitamins will lead to better mood, higher energy, healthier immune system, decreased stress, and improved red blood cell production." B vitamins are water-soluble, meaning they must be replenished daily and are easily obtained from common foods, including animal proteins, dairy products, leafy greens, and legumes. Increasing B-vitamin intake through dietary variety is both more affordable and more effective than supplementation for most people.
Month 3: "Consistent natural vitamin A from beef organs can lead to better signs of skin health, delayed signs of aging, reduced acne, and better vision." According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, less than 1% of Americans are at risk for vitamin A deficiency. This claim targets cosmetic concerns rather than addressing actual nutritional needs.
Month 6: "Blend of vitamins, minerals, and amino acids found in beef organs peak for enhanced mental clarity, better muscle function, and improved recovery after physical activities." This vague statement doesn’t specify which vitamins, minerals, or amino acids provide these benefits. The six-month timeline appears arbitrary - why would these nutrients “peak” at exactly six months, and why would benefits plateau or decline afterward? This timing likely encourages customers to continue purchasing for six months before expecting results.
Month 12: "Proteins that impact women’s health have reached optimized levels which can result in optimal menstruation and menstrual flow, properly balanced hormones, and less menstrual cramps and hot flashes." There’s no such thing as “optimal” menstruation. Healthy menstrual cycles can range from 21-35 days, and some menstrual discomfort is normal. Reproductive health concerns deserve proper medical attention, not expensive supplements with vague promises.
Read also: How digestive health affects weight loss
The Proprietary Blend Problem: Lack of Transparency
Primal Queen uses a “proprietary blend,” which is a major red flag. Proprietary blends allow companies to hide the specific dosages of individual ingredients, making it impossible to:
- Verify if ingredients are present in therapeutic amounts
- Identify potential interactions with medications
- Determine if you’re getting too much of certain nutrients
- Compare products effectively
This opacity serves manufacturers’ interests, not consumers’ health.
Regulatory Oversight: A System of Post-Market Surveillance
The law gives the FDA the authority to oversee supplements through post-market surveillance for unsafe products rather than by requiring companies to provide safety information to the FDA for pre-market evaluation and approval, as long as products don’t contain new dietary ingredients that weren’t sold before 1994, with limited exceptions. Depending on a company’s claims about its dietary supplement, efficacy testing may not be required either.
This regulatory framework means:
- No pre-market safety evaluation by FDA required for many supplement ingredients
- No efficacy proof needed before making certain health claims (with specific disclaimer requirements)
- Limited oversight of manufacturing processes and facilities compared to pharmaceutical standards
- Reactive rather than proactive regulatory enforcement, typically occurring only after problems are reported
To help individuals distinguish between products that have been evaluated by FDA as drugs (safe and effective) and dietary supplements that have not, supplement packages claiming certain types of health or nutrition benefit must include the FDA disclaimer: “This statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.”
Read also: Weight Loss Meds & BCBS
Under current regulations, companies may make health claims in advertising and labeling, but they must have a reasonable basis - typically including scientific evidence - to support those claims. If the scientific support is limited, they are required to clearly and conspicuously disclose those limitations to avoid being deceptive. This often creates an environment where marketing departments have more influence over product messaging than scientific evidence and medical researchers.
Targeting Women: Marketing Tactics and Unmet Needs
Primal Queen specifically targets women with taglines like “100% formulated by women, for women (sorry guys!)” and urges “busy women, female athletes, mothers, and health conscious queens” to “prioritize their health” and “unleash their inner queen.” This marketing strategy exploits a vulnerable population that often feels neglected by the healthcare system.
Women’s health is indeed chronically underfunded in research. Gynecological conditions like endometriosis affect 10% of women but take an average of 8 years to diagnose. These legitimate healthcare gaps create fertile ground for companies like Primal Queen to position themselves as allies while charging premium prices for unproven solutions.
Instead of advocating for better research funding or more affordable healthcare options, Primal Queen capitalizes on women’s frustration by offering expensive false hope wrapped in empowering language.
Industry-Wide Patterns: Recognizing the Tactics
The Primal Queen case study illustrates broader patterns in supplement marketing that consumers should recognize:
- Identify underserved populations (women frustrated with healthcare gaps)
- Leverage cognitive biases (appeal to nature fallacy, ancestral nutrition claims)
- Create elaborate benefit lists (multiple health claims targeting various concerns)
- Provide minimal supporting evidence (single non-peer-reviewed studies)
- Employ premium pricing strategies (positioning high cost as an indicator of quality)
- Use empowering messaging (feminist language, community building)
This approach appears effective because it addresses real problems - such as research gaps in women’s health - while offering solutions that may not have robust scientific support. The regulatory environment allows this marketing approach to flourish, since companies can make health claims while disclaiming medical responsibility.
The Appeal to Nature Fallacy: A Misleading Argument
The company uses the appeal to nature fallacy, which assumes that naturally occurring substances are inherently safe and beneficial. This logical fallacy ignores the reality that many naturally occurring substances, like mercury or arsenic, can be harmful to humans, while many synthetic compounds are both safe and beneficial.