Netflix's "Fit for TV: The Reality of The Biggest Loser" is a three-episode docuseries that revisits the controversial NBC weight loss competition, "The Biggest Loser," which aired for 18 seasons between 2004 and 2016. The documentary aims to dissect the show's legacy by featuring interviews with creators, hosts, medical personnel, and former contestants, revealing the complexities and potential harm behind the popular reality show.
Origins and Popularity
The documentary delves into the origins of "The Biggest Loser," with executive producers JD Roth and David Broome providing insights into the show's conception. The series quickly gained immense popularity after its debut, transforming from 500 auditionees to thousands of hopefuls. The producers aimed to inspire viewers through the contestants' dramatic weight loss journeys.
A Glimpse Behind the Scenes
"Fit for TV" exposes the manipulative and unethical challenges, the physical and emotional toll on contestants during and after filming, and the long-term health consequences, such as metabolic slowdown and chronic ailments. Dr. Robert Huizenga, the show's medical advisor, reveals instances where challenges he didn't endorse were implemented in his absence.
Contestant Experiences
The documentary features a range of contestant experiences, from those who are grateful for the opportunity to those who are determined to expose the show's dangers. Tracey Yukich, a contestant on the show, aptly stated, "You need to cheer for yourself… The show didn't change my life. I changed my life. I did that." Some contestants, like Danny Cahill, the winner of season eight, gained back the weight they lost. This raises questions about the sustainability of the show's methods.
Ethical Concerns and Criticisms
"Fit for TV" highlights several ethical concerns surrounding "The Biggest Loser." Some contestants have accused the show of fostering an environment where they felt pressured to starve themselves, use weight-loss drugs, and overexercise. The documentary also touches on the lack of aftercare provided to contestants, leaving them vulnerable to regaining weight and struggling with psychological issues.
Read also: Weight Loss Guide Andalusia, AL
Fat-Shaming and Humiliation
Several reviewers noted the presence of fat-shaming and humiliation on the show. The trainers' methods, which included screaming and verbal abuse, are shown in the documentary and are critiqued for their potential to cause emotional harm. One reviewer described the show's creators as "profiting off televised humiliation and suffering."
Medical Concerns
The documentary raises concerns about the medical practices on the show, including allegations of contestants being given caffeine pills to suppress appetite and stimulate energy, despite warnings from the show's doctor. The treatment of a woman with rhabdomyolysis is also questioned, with some arguing that she was owed an apology from the trainers and producers.
The Role of Trainers
Bob Harper, one of the show's trainers, defends the show and claims that many people were helped. However, he acknowledges that weight loss is primarily about calorie deficit, suggesting that the intense exercise routines were largely for show. Jillian Michaels, the other prominent trainer, declined to participate in the documentary.
Societal Context
The documentary touches on the broader societal context of obesity and diet culture. It notes that obesity rates have continued to rise since "The Biggest Loser" first aired, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive approach to addressing weight issues. Aubrey Gordon, an author and podcaster who has written extensively about weight-related issues, suggests that the show tried to do deep emotional work without having qualified professionals on staff.
Limitations of the Documentary
While "Fit for TV" raises important questions about "The Biggest Loser," some reviewers felt that it didn't go deep enough. Some felt that the documentary failed to widen the lens to the real backdrop: America's obesogenic environment, where unhealthy, ultra-processed foods are cheaper and more accessible than their healthier counterparts. Others felt that it lacked a clear narrative through-line and could have benefited from fewer voices and more analysis.
Read also: Beef jerky: A high-protein option for shedding pounds?
Read also: Inspiring Health Transformation