John the Baptist, a pivotal figure in the New Testament, is described as living an ascetic life in the wilderness. A key aspect of this lifestyle was his unusual diet, which the Gospels of Matthew and Mark identify as "locusts and wild honey" (Matthew 3:4, Mark 1:6). This seemingly simple description has been the subject of much debate and interpretation over the centuries. Was John truly eating insects, or could "locusts" refer to something else entirely?
The Traditional Interpretation: Locusts as Insects
The most common and traditional understanding is that John the Baptist consumed actual locusts, the insects. This interpretation aligns with the literal meaning of the Greek word akrides, which is consistently used throughout the Bible to refer to locusts.
Furthermore, the Old Testament, specifically Leviticus 11:22, explicitly permits the consumption of locusts under Mosaic law: "Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind." This verse indicates that locusts were considered a clean and acceptable food source for the Israelites.
Historical evidence also supports this interpretation. Ancient texts and bas-reliefs from Nineveh depict the consumption of locusts in the Middle East. The Orientals are accustomed to feed upon locusts, either raw or roasted and seasoned with salt (or prepared in other ways), and the Israelites also were permitted to eat them. Many Africans and Arabs eat locusts after removing the wings, legs, and heads, either cooked or ground up as flour. This practice continues in some parts of the world today, where locusts are considered a nutritious and readily available source of protein.
Biblical scholar John Lightfoot also supports the insect interpretation, referring to locusts as "bugs" in his writings.
Read also: The Hoxsey Diet
The Carob Pod Hypothesis: A Vegetarian Alternative?
Despite the widespread acceptance of the insect interpretation, an alternative theory suggests that "locusts" might refer to carob pods, also known as locust beans. This hypothesis proposes that the term was used in the 1st century for something other than bugs. Carob pods are the fruit of the carob tree, a common plant in the Mediterranean region. They are naturally sweet and sticky, making them a palatable food source.
The carob pod theory often arises from a sense of squeamishness about the idea of John the Baptist, a revered religious figure, consuming insects. Some proponents of this theory believe that a true ascetic should adhere to a completely vegetarian diet.
However, this interpretation faces several challenges. The Greek word akrides is not typically used to refer to carob pods. Moreover, there is limited evidence to support the idea that the term "locusts" was used to describe carob pods in the 1st century.
Wild Honey: A Sweetener and Source of Sustenance
Regardless of whether John the Baptist ate insects or carob pods, the other component of his diet, "wild honey," is generally understood to be honey produced by wild bees. This type of honey would have been readily available in the wilderness of Judea, where John lived.
Honey is a nutritious food source, providing carbohydrates for energy and various vitamins and minerals. It would have served as a valuable source of sustenance for John, supplementing his primary food source, whether locusts or carob pods.
Read also: Walnut Keto Guide
The Significance of John's Diet: Asceticism and Spiritual Devotion
Ultimately, the exact nature of John the Baptist's diet may remain a subject of debate. However, the broader significance of his dietary choices is clear. John's simple and austere diet reflects his ascetic lifestyle and his unwavering devotion to God.
Biblical scholar John Nolland notes that the decision by the author of Matthew to provide a description of John's clothing and diet shows that both are unusual and worth commenting on.
By choosing to live in the wilderness and subsist on readily available, albeit unconventional, foods, John distanced himself from the comforts and luxuries of society. His diet symbolized his rejection of worldly pleasures and his commitment to spiritual pursuits.
The description of John the Baptist's clothing is believed by most scholars to be a deliberate echo that of the prophet Elijah, who in 2 Kings 1:8 is said to wear "a garment of hair and with a leather belt around his waist.
Different Interpretations and Perspectives
The interpretation of John the Baptist's diet has also played a role in the development of Christian monasticism. John the Baptist viewed as a model ascetic. The sparse food and uncomfortable clothing, including the wearing of hairshirts became seen as the ideal of Christian asceticism. However, John Calvin wholly rejected this interpretation. He did not see this verse presenting John the Baptist as an ideal, but rather presenting an accurate portrait of one forced to live in the wilderness.
Read also: Weight Loss with Low-FODMAP
Pseudo-Chrysostom: Having said that he is the voice of one crying in the desert, the Evangelist well adds, John had his clothing of camel's hair; thus showing what his life was; for he indeed testified of Christ, but his life testified of himself. Pseudo-Chrysostom: It becomes the servants of God to use a dress not for elegant appearance, or for cherishing of the body, but for a covering of the nakedness. Thus John wears a garment not soft and delicate, but hairy, heavy, rough, rather wounding the skin than cherishing it, that even the very clothing of his body told of the virtue of his mind. Rabanus Maurus: Content with poor fare; to wit, small insects and honey gathered from the trunks of trees. In the sayings of Arnulphusa, Bishop of Gaul, we find that there was a very small kind of locust in the deserts of Judæa, with bodies about the thickness of a finger and short; they are easily taken among the grass, and when cooked in oil form a poor kind of food. Rabanus Maurus: His dress and diet express the quality of his inward conversation. Hilary of Poitiers: The preacher of Christ is clad in the skins of unclean beasts, to which the Gentiles are compared, and so by the Prophets’ dress is sanctified whatever in them was useless or unclean. The girdle is a thing of much efficacy to every good work, that we may be girt for every ministry of Christ.